![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIYqGEt3tvl8pIY4v0bmoOcMc0_AcqUuPzkM9j3tHFZylwa5u7OGGvl-7hJ9YwT6DsV6Qf8QsgHxAq1tFH3kwC2luBlq6JgljJYxGoW7m3AwQOZKCBHm4qFAh4I8rc6NGxHv2rZ_MdQVDQ/s320/eris2.jpg)
It will never hit earth. The closest range will be 96.008 AU. Our sun is at the distance of 0.02 AU from the earth !
Go and have a good sleep
brown dwarf, december 21st, doomsday in 2012, global warming, infrared observations, iras observation, kuiper belt, long-period comet, nasa, nibiru, nibiru, planet x, planet-x, solar system, sumerian myth,30au,540 au,babylon,brown dwarf,december 21st,doomsday in 2012,environmental damage,global warming,infrared observations,iras observation,kuiper belt,long-period comet,nasa,nibiru,nibiru, planet x,orbital perturbations,planet-x,solar system,sumerian myth,space
I hope this is my last comment on the Nibiru hoax, but questions like the above six keep coming in. Most of the entries on the Internet about Nibiru are false. Wikipedia has it correct when they write that "Nibiru is a name in Sumerian, Babylonian astrology associated with the god Marduk, generally accepted as referring to the planet Jupiter." The rest is a hoax, including all the "stuff" questioner #! found on the internet. Questioners #2 and #3 mention the astronomical observatory at the South Pole, but I assure you these astronomers are not looking at Nibiru. The Antarctic is a great place for astronomical infrared and short-wave-radio observations, and it also has the advantage that objects can be observed continuously without the interference of the day-night cycle. If the questioner really thinks that Nibiru is visible in the daytime in the southern hemisphere, they are very confused; this sort of statement is obviously false. Questioners #3 and #4 seem to think that the government would hide information about Nibiru and the catastrophe supposedly due in a few years, but I can't imagine why. My experience is, in fact, that sometimes parts of the government do just the opposite, as in the frequent references to various terrorist threats or warnings about driving accidents on long holiday weekends, which are no more dangerous than any other time. In any case, the job of NASA scientists is to discover and tell the truth! Questioner (5) asks if Nibiru is the same as Eris, and the answer is an emphatic no. This Nibiru hoax has been around for a decade, including predictions that Nibiru would pass close to Earth and cause a catastrophe about 5 years ago. (Guess what: it didn't happen!). Eris, in contrast, is one of several dwarf planets recently found by astronomers in the outer part of out solar system, all of them on normal orbits that will never bring them close to Earth. There is a good write-up on Eris in Wikipedia. Finally, Questioner (6) asks me to identify two pictures. I could perhaps do so if I knew the type of telescope and camera used and the scale of photos. Without that information, I can only guess that (if these photos are real) these might be images of a gas cloud (nebula) ejected by a star in its old age. They are obviously very distant, since we see stars in the foreground superposed on the nebula. Also, since the stars are the same, this object (if it is real) has not moved between the dates of the two photos. It is just crazy that anyone would claim that these are photos of a planet in our own solar system. Let me say once again that Nibiru is a hoax promoted by a cult; it does not exist, and it certainly poses no threat to us. It saddens me that people would be taken in by such nonsense. David Morrison
NAI Senior Scientist
February 7, 2008